ChessBase Magazine 133
|
Languages:
|
German, English
|
|
Delivery:
|
Post
|
€19.95
€16.76 without VAT (for Customers outside the EU)
$21.51 (without VAT)
Four highlights and a new number one. That is the summary of the autumn of 2009 in chess. It ran from the Pearl Spring Tournament in Nanjing with the triumphal success of Magnus Carlsen via the European Club and National Championships to the major high point of the year, the Tal Memorial in Moscow, which Vladimir Kramnik was able to take with half a point of a lead. The new (unofficial) number one in the FIDE world ranking list is now Magnus Carlsen, whose second place in Moscow was sufficient for him to push Topalov from the top spot.
 |
| |
Introductory
videos |
 |
In
his 16 minute introductory video, GM Karsten
Müller outlines the main points of this DVD
and presents in Carlsen’s first round victory over Leko from
Nanjing and Bacrot’s strong innovation in the popular
Anti-Meran against Aronian two star games from this issue. At
the same time he summarises in the Caro-Kann with 3.f3 and a
compact repertoire for Black against the French Tarrasch
Variation, two of the total of 12 openings articles in this
issue. Click here or on the image of the
video on the left and let Karsten Müller get you in the mood
for CBM 133!
|
 |
GM
Dorian Rogozenco reviews in chronological order and on
two videos the four tournament highlights of the past autumn.
From the super-tournament in Nanjing he explains Carlsen’s
victories over Topalov and Jakovenko. In his remarks describes
in exemplary fashion the qualities of the young Norwegian. And
the European Cup in Ohrid also offered a plethora of
theoretically significant games that are also worth seeing;
Rogozenco introduces one game each from Motylev and
Sargissian. To finish, Rogozenco describes the
decisive moment in the European
Championship in Novi
Sad. |
 |
In
Rogozenco’s evaluation the Tal memorial in Moscow
represents the strongest tournament of the year and not just
because it included in Anand and Kramnik a World Champion and
an ex World Champion. As an example of the high level of the
theoretical work prepared for the opening, he introduces the
game Anand - Leko with a surprising innovation in a popular
variation of the Anti-Meran. A further example is Kramnik’s
innovation against Svidler’s Grünfeld Defence.
Rogozenco’s analysis of the game Ivanchuk – Kramnik, which
comes at the end of this second
video, makes clear just how
open the result of the Tal Memorial was until the very last
minute. The Ukrainian had built up a brilliant attacking
position and with the correct continuation could have wrested
the tournament victory away from Kramnik. |
| 05.11.-14.11.2009

Vladimir
Kramnik:
back to his old class
|
Tal
Memorial in Moskau
This
high point of the season in Moscow saw at the start, apart
from Topalov, the complete and absolute world elite including
Carlsen, Anand, Kramnik, Aronian, and Ivanchuk. Added to that
were Gelfand, Leko, Svidler, Morozevich and Ponomariov. After
Carlsen’s triumph in China there was great excitement: would
the Norwegian be able to continue his triumphal procession in
Moscow? But in the very first round Kramnik’s game against
the Norwegian revealed that he was full of ideas and ambition.
After his third round victory over Morozevich he reined in
Svidler in round 4 in the latter’s special opening, the Grünfeld
Defence. Two rounds later Kramnik managed another convincing
win with White over Ponomariov and this almost decided the
tournament victory. You will find all the games from the Tal
Memorial as well as a tournament report here or
via "Tal Memorial" in the left-hand column.
|
|

Carlsen,M - Ponomariov,R
Position
after 19.Nfxe6
|
For
a long time in Moscow, Magnus Carlsen was not able to tap into
his outstanding form from Nanjing (see below), obviously this
was also on account of a viral illness. All
his games from rounds 1 to 7 ended in draws. In
last two rounds the Norwegian got going once more and scored
wins in his games against Ponomariov and Leko. In Carlsen
- Ponomariov the Norwegian
innovated in the English Attack against the Najdorf Variation
with 11.Qe1 and then went on to start a successful attack on
the black king. His belated victories raised Carlsen at the
end of the Tal Memorial to a shared second place. What was
even more significant was the circumstance that Carlsen had
gone past Topalov to occupy the first place on the FIDE world
ranking list. |
|

Kramnik,V - Anand,V
Position
before 18...Nxf3
|
Romanian
GM Mihail Marin has surveyed and commented on the DVD
on the most important theoretical developments and discussions
in the opening during the super-tournament in Moscow. The main
focus was on the 1.d4-openings, above all the Grünfeld
Defence, against which Kramnik, amongst others, had to play
twice and had mixed success. Anand was again successful
against Svidler with the modern 5.Bd2 and was also able to
achieve draws with three of his games as Black with the Grünfeld
Defence, including a strong innovation in Kramnik
- Anand (see diagram). Other
major focal points in Marin’s theoretical survey are the
Ragosin Defence in the Queen’s Gambit, the Catalan and the
Semi-Slav. |
| 28.09.-09.10.2009

Magnus
is the greatest
|
Pearl
Spring Turnier in Nanjing
Sometimes
numbers simply say more than words. With 8 out of 10, an Elo
performance of 3002, 5 out of 5 with the white pieces, not a
single defeat and a lead of 2.5 points, Magnus Carlsen
celebrated his first tournament victory of the year. A
triumphal procession in the former Chinese imperial city of
Nanjing for the young Norwegian dressed in red brocade. On the
DVD Carlsen annotates his first round victory against Peter
Leko, against whom he employed one of the weapons of his new
trainer, Garry Kasparov: the Scotch.
|
|

Carlsen,M - Leko,P
Position
after 15.d5
|
For
Leko, Carlsen’s choice of opening obviously came as a real
surprise. And also with the positional pawn sacrifice 10.f4
and 13.g3 Carlsen chose a rather out-of-fashion variation and
in doing so followed Morozevich’s game against Kramnik from
2001. Two moves later and the Norwegian had on the board the
position he had wanted to have in this game and which he had
analysed beforehand (see diagram). For the pawn he has
sacrificed, White has an advantage in space and the bishop
pair and it is not clear how Black can plan the coordination
of his pieces. In any case the black queenside looks rather
susceptible already on account of White’s threatened piece
play. Click here or
on the link under the diagram and let Magnus Carlsen explain
the key moments in this game to you. |
|

Radjabov,T - Topalov,V
Position
after 21...Qxd6
|
There
was another high class Scotch game in the encounter Radjabov
- Topalov, in
which both sides first followed their game from the Grand Slam
Finale in Bilbao 2008. This time, however, Radjabov managed to
set his opponent serious problems in the opening. Just when
Topalov was setting about freeing his position, Radjabov
missed a clear way to a win and, beginning with 22.Bf5+, went
on to exchange off the queens.
Can
you see how, in the position on the board, White could have
decided the game in his favour? In the game Radjabov obtained
the superior endgame with rook + distant passed pawn against
bishop + knight, but in the long run deviated from the path to
a win. In his analysis Radjabov turns the microscope on the
game from A to Z and demonstrates the possible ways to a win,
both in the middlegame and in the endgame. |
| 22.10.-30.10.2009

Their
first ECh victory: Azerbaijan
|
European Team
Championship in Novi Sad
Geographically
Azerbaijan is on the western shores of the Caspian Sea and
thus on the extreme edge of Europe. From the point of view of
chess, the country has come right into the middle of Europe
with its victory in the ECh in Novi Sad. Whereas on board 1
Radjabov was going through a slight crisis in his form,
Gashimov, Mamedyarov and Mamedov were according to ELO
performance amongst the six best players in the ECh. Vugar
Gashimov has annotated two of his games for this CBM,
including the decisive victory over Stellwagen in the final
round.
|
|

Gashimov,V - Roiz,M
Position
after 25.c5
|
In Gashimov -
Roiz the
error 24...b4? was followed by the decisive attack on the
black king, starting with the subtle 25.c5 (see diagram).
Instead of embarking on damage limitation with 25...Nc6 the
Israeli grandmaster captured on c5, which led to a clear
deterioration in the structure of his position. You really
should not miss how Gashimov went about the win, including his
exchange sacrifice. |
|

Gashimov,V -
Stellwagen,D
Position
after 36.g4
|
The
spectators experienced a dramatic showdown in the final round.
Russia only required a victory over Spain, but with
Alekseev’s defeat at the hands of Salgado and Morozevich’s
victory over Vallejo they only managed to achieve 2:2. So the
team from Azerbaijan got the chance to get through to first
place with a victory over the Netherlands. With the score at
1.5:1.5 the decision would come in the game Gashimov
- Stellwagen. The Dutch player came
out of the opening with a slightly passive position, but,
e.g., had a very stable position thanks to his excellent
knight outpost on d5. Gashimov, in all his efforts all the way
to a rook ending, could not manage to achieve a bankable
advantage and he mentions in his commentary that just before
Stellwagen’s blunder on move 70 he felt he was heading for a
draw. Click on one of the links and play through the decisive
game of Novi
Sad with the comments of the match winner himself. |
|

Eljanov:
flying
high after his wedding
|
The
Ukraine had to do without their top board Ivanchuk in Novi
Sad. However, with a bit of luck, they even managed to finish
up with the bronze medal. This was in no small measure due to Pavel
Eljanov. Since his marriage with
WIM Olena Dvoretska in May
of this year, there seems to be nothing to stop him. Still
under ELO 2700 in April, he has now reached 11th place in the
world ranking list. As in earlier issues of ChessBase
Magazine, Eljanov has once more sent in analysis of his games,
this time a total of three: his game
against Navara from Novi Sad
and two games from Ohrid (see below), where he led his team to
victory in the Europa Cup. |
|

Navara,D - Eljanov,P
Position
after 19...Nb8
|
Eljanov
was successful as Black against the number one of the Czech
Republic in a Catalan. Navara had – of course not an unusual
thing – sacrificed a pawn on c4, although he had already
moved his dark-squared bishop to d2. Eljanov takes a critical
look in his analysis at his opponent’s opening choice and
comes to the conclusion that after only 10 moves Black has an
advantage. In fact, in the middlegame he managed to hold on to
the extra pawn. In the position in the diagram opposite, the
Ukrainian found in 19...Nb8 a strong continuation, because the
knight can not only defend the pawn on c6, but afterwards go
via a6 to the active square b4. |
| 04.10.-10.10.2009

Europas neue Nr. 1: Economist Saratov
|
European
Club Cup in Ohrid
Seven
rounds, seven victories – this majestic result won for the
team of Economist Saratov the European Club Cup in Ohrid. The
Russian team with Alekseev, Eljanov, Ni Hua, Bu Xiangzhi,
Moiseenko etc. displayed good nerves right up until the end and
secured the gold medal in the last round with a 3.5:2.5
victory over Ashdod Illit from Israel.
Top scorers for the victorious team were Alexander Moiseenko
and - once more - Pavel Eljanov.
|
|

Eljanov,P - Giri,A
Position
after 11...f5
|
IIn
the second round the Ukrainian had White against the just 15
year old Dutch GM Anish Giri. In a Queen’s Gambit Accepted,
both sides got to work energetically, In the variation with
6.Nh4 Giri chose the unusual 6...Bd7 and poured more oil on
the fire with the innovation 11...f5 (see diagram). In his
analysis Eljanov praises his opponent’s new idea, because
any other, passive continuation would leave White with a
powerful initiative.
In the game there followed 12.Ng5 Qxd4 13.Qh5+ Kd8 with a very
madcap position and two shaky kings on a full board. In this
phase Eljanov kept his eye on everything and remained calm,
first winning back the sacrificed pawn and then another pawn,
and then liquidating to a favourable endgame via an exchange
of queens. At this critical moment Giri reacted too passively
and allowed his opponent to decide the game in
his favour thanks to a tactical trick. |
|

Eljanov,P - Akopian,V
Position
after 18.Ra2
|
The game Eljanov
- Akopian from
round 6 is an absolute model for attacking chess. In a modern
Catalan with 4.Nc3 Eljanov early on offered his opponent a
second pawn sacrifice. But although Akopian turned down this
offer, he once more found himself very much under pressure
after the opening, and with e4, f4, g4 and g5 White drummed up
a pawn storm against the opposing king. With 18.Ra2 (diagram)
White is preparing more than the doubling of rooks on the
f-file. From there the rook is aiming for f3, because from
that post it will be making dangerous threats to swing over to
the g-file or even the h-file. Click here
or on the link under the diagram and Eljanov will explain to
you the subtleties of his winning plan. |
|

Timofeev,A - Volokitin,A
Position
after 14.Ne5
|
Measured
by ELO performance it was Andrei Volokitin in Ohrid who
had the best result after Peter Svidler. For this issue of
ChessBase Magazine he has analysed three of his games from the
Europa Cup and tells us, e.g., about his first experiences
with the Dutch. In the game Timofeev
- Volokitin it was the popular
Leningrad Variation that was up for discussion – according
to Volokitin the best reply to 1.d4 at the moment, if one
wants to win. In the game, just as he successfully completed
the development of his pieces, he was surprised by
Timofeev’s attack with the knight 14.Ne5 (see diagram).
Black must now either give up the pawn on c6 or separate
himself from his bishop d7. Volokitin decided on the pawn
sacrifice and showed in the game, that the advance on the
kingside offers Black sufficient compensation. Volokitin has
annotated this game in depth from start to finish – it comes
highly recommended, and not only for friends of the Leningrad
Variation! |
|

Andrei Volokitin:
the
Dutch is ok!
|
In Sakaev -
Volokitin too,
the young Russian opted for the Dutch Defence. This time his
opponent decided on an unorthodox Anti-Dutch and tried to
break up the black pawn chain in the centre with the typical
thrust g4. But the young Russian kept a cool head and after
his king had wandered to the queenside he obtained the better
game thanks to his bishop pair and the c-file. He finally
decided the game in his favour in a rook ending. Volokitin
- Kuzubov is also interesting form the point of view of
opening theory. In a rare variation of the Caro-Kann with
3.Nc3 Kuzubov chose in 10...Bxf4 more than a dubious
continuation. He was, presumably unknowingly, following the
game Volokitin - Predojevic from 2007 (1-0). After a few
inaccuracies on both sides, Volokitin dominated the game and
forced the decision by means of the central thrust d5. |
|

The Opening Trap:
11...Qc7 was a mistake, why?
|
From
the opening trap to the endgame study
Training
in ChessBase Magazine starts with the very first moves and
takes in all the phases of a game of chess. The
12 up-to-date openings articles with their numerous
ideas and suggestions for your repertoire can be found here or
above among the links. On this occasion Rainer Knaak has
selected his opening traps - exclusively from the
European Cup. For Dragon fans, the main interest will be the
two contributions in video format: Leonid Kritz has
investigated a sub-variation of the main line with 9.Bc4 and
Dorian Rogozenco concentrates on the move order 9.0-0-0 d5.
You will find these and other videos in the column Fritztrainer.
In his Strategy column Peter Wells casts some
light on the theme of “The safety of the king in simplified
positions”. In Daniel King’s long running Move by Move
there is an instructive game from the Europa Cup there for
training. And in the Tactics
and Endgame columns
Oliver Reeh and Karsten Müller have once more assembled for
you all that is best in recent tournament praxis.
|
| |
|
 |
|
Opening
surveys
Marin:
Alekhine Defence B04
1.e4
Nf6 2.e5 Nd5 3.d4 d6 4.Nf3 g6 5.Bc4 Nb6 6.Bb3 Bg7
|

|
|
This
time the alternatives to 7.Ng5 are examined: above all 7.Qe2 and
7.a4. However, Black has various ideas – e.g. pressure against
e5 and exchanging the Bb3 by Nc6-a5
– and White cannot prevent all of them. |
Erenburg:
Caro-Kann B12
1.e4
c6 2.d4 d5 3.f3 e6 4.Nc3
Bb4 5.Bf4
 |
|
The
name Fantasy Variation for the move 3.f3 is a little deceptive,
because it is the start of a respectable opening system, in
which Black has to play some accurate moves and to work hard for
equality. |
Kuzmin:
Sicilian B80
1.e4
c5 2.Nf3
d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4
Nf6
5.Nc3
a6 6.Be3 e6 7.f3 h5
 |
|
Directed
against g2-g4, the move 7...h5 has many advantages, the
disadvantage – the weakening of the kingside, however, does
not become apparent for quite a long time. Kuzmin demonstrates
amongst others the most dangerous variation (9.Bc4)
and how Black can meet it. |
Berg:
Sicilian B97
1.e4
c5 2.Nf3
d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4
Nf6
5.Nc3
a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.f4 Qb6 8.Qd3
 |
|
8.Qd3
in the Poisoned Pawn Variation offers a few advantages compared
to 8.Qd2.
These are clearly brought out in Berg’s contribution. But it
is unclear, whether there are also disadvantages and so the best
way for Black to treat the move is still veiled in mystery. |
Moskalenko:
French C05
1.e4
e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2
Nf6
4.e5 Nfd7
 |
|
Our
author presents a compact repertoire against the Tarrasch
Variation, basing it on 3...Nf6.
He demonstrates the most important variations and ideas in only
5 games. |
Kritz:
French C18
1.e4
e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3
Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Ba5 6.b4 cxd4 7.Qg4
 |
|
The
variation with 7.Qg4 is far more ambitious than that with 7.Nb5
which was treated in CBM 132. As the author proves, Black is in
great difficulties and there are also no promising alternatives
in sight. |
Skembris:
Petroff Defence C42
1.e4
e5 2.Nf3
Nf6
3.Nxe5
d6 4.Nf3
Nxe4
5.d4 d5 6.Bd3 Nd6!?
7.0-0 Be7
 |
|
The
move 6...Nd6!?
allows you to avoid the voluminous variations of theory, which
means that the Petroff becomes interesting for club players too.
But Black still has to find a few precise moves before reaching
complete equality. |
Stohl:
Scotch C45
1.e4
e5 2.Nf3
Nc6
3.d4 exd4 4.Nxd4
Bc5 5.Be3 Qf6 6.c3 Nge7
7.Bc4 Ne5
8.Be2 Qg6 9.0-0 d6 10.f4
 |
|
Magnus
Carlsen used the pawn sacrifice 10.f4 against Leko and gained an
impressive victory, sufficient reason for Igor Stohl to take a
close look at this variation. His conclusion: Black can equalise
with best play. |
Marin:
Ruy Lopez C66
1.e4
e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 d6 4.d4 Bd7 5.0-0 Nf6 6.Nc3
 |
|
With
6...Be7 Black allows 7.Bxc6,
but the immediate 6...exd4 also has its disadvantages. Mihail
Marin thoroughly investigates both variations and weighs up
advantages and disadvantages. He considers both very playable. |
Karolyi:
Queen's Gambit Accepted D20
1.d4
d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.e4 c5 4.Nf3
cxd4
 |
|
After
looking at 4.d5 in CBM 132 Tibor Karolyi now investigates 4.Nf3;
White hopes that his lead in development will bring him an
advantage after 4...cxd4 5.Qxd4 Qxd4 6.Nxd4 Bd7 7.Bxc4.
But the analyses demonstrate that Black equalises without too
much effort. |
Langrock:
Queen's Indian Defence E12
1.d4
Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.a3 Bb7
5.Nc3 g6
 |
|
In
the concluding part, Hannes Langrock subjects the critical
continuations 6.Qc2 and 6.Bg5
to thorough analysis. His examination of them proves that Black
need fear neither of these moves. |
|
Krasenkow:
King's Indian E90
1.d4
Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7
4.e4 d6 5.Nf3 0-0 6.h3 e5
7.d5
 |
|
In
Part 2 (of a total of 3) Michal Krasenkow investigates
all the continuations after 7.d5, except for 7...a5. It
appears that White can obtain an advantage after both
7...Nh5 and 7...Na6. |
|
|
Often ordered with...
Similar Products
|